I found the following paragraph interesting
"For our part, we take seriously the possibility that the consumer surplus from piracy might be more productive, socially valuable, and/or job creating than additional investment in the software and media sectors. We think this likelihood increases in markets for entertainment goods, which contribute to growth but add little to productivity, and still further in countries that import most of their audiovisual goods and software—in short, virtually everywhere outside the United States. "
open...: The Origins of Europe's Suicidal Copyright Policies

because it states the relative value of an industry in economic terms. I'm not saying I agree with the statement but entertainment while to an extent is adds balance to a life, it can also be considered as a luxury in that it isn't a necessity of life. People have an insatiable demand for entertainment so there is some value to helping to facilitate this demand but in an other seance it can be considered excessive Decadence to devote an extensive portion of societies wealth to entertainment. Well entertainment generally contributes to the well bearing of society, so does free speech, privacy and a reasonable assessment of damages based on the offense. The excessive monopolization and control of media by large industry disproportionally distributes the rewards of creative and preformative enterprises to a small few performers and corporations.